Legal Opinion

B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Murtha

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 8, 1991No. Civil H-87-52 (PCD)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DORSEY, District Judge.

The consolidated actions pertain to the cleanup of two landfills, Beacon Heights Landfill (“Beacon Heights”) in Beacon Falls, Connecticut, and Laurel Park Landfill (“Laurel Park”) in Naugatuck, Connecticut, identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and placed on the National Priority List, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA” or “Superfund”), 42 U.S.C. § 9601, et seq., as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (“SARA”). The…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. MurthaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  2. Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  3. Jones-Hamilton Co., a California Corporation v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc. Kop-Coat, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Goodrich v. BetkoskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  5. CPC International, Inc. v. Aerojet-General Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API