Legal Opinion
United States v. Krystal T. Layne (01-6288) William Dick (01-6399)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 1, 2003No. 01-6288, 01-6399PublishedCited by 105 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants William Dick and Krystal Tate Layne (“Defendants”) were convicted of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine with the intent to distribute the same. Defendants now appeal the sentences they received as a result of the district court’s application of United States Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) § 2D1.1(b)(6)(A) in their cases. Defendants: (1) complain that the district court erroneously concluded that they operated a methamphetamine laboratory that posed a substantial risk of harm to human life, triggering the application of §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by105 opinions
- State v. MeeksTennessee Supreme Court · 2008
- United States v. StatenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Charles Anthony Davidson (03-6544) Debra Ann Davidson (03-6549)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.