Legal Opinion

United States v. Charles Anthony Davidson (03-6544) Debra Ann Davidson (03-6549)

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 18, 2005No. 03-6544, 03-6549PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, Judge, joined by Edmunds, District Judge,

GIBBONS, Judge (p. 315), delivered a separate concurring opinion.

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

These appeals concern the applicability of two subdivisions of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”).1 Defendant-Appellant Debra Ann Davidson (“Mrs.Davidson”) challenges the district court’s decision to apply both the § 2Dl.l(b)(l) firearm enhancement (“Firearm Enhancement”) and the § 2Dl.l(b)(5)(B) substantial-risk-of-harm-enhancement (“Substantial-Risk-of-Harm Enhancement”), while Defendant-Appellant Charles Anthony Davidson (“Mr.Davidson”) challenges only the application of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. David C. Hughes, the Office of the Federal Public Defender, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. David Lee OliverCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. United States v. Sean Michael GrierCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. Roger D. BlackwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. DeitzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. Clifton L. CousinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  5. United States v. Anastasios S. KatzopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API