Legal Opinion

Stokes v. Ford Motor Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 2013No. DA 11-0713PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rice

¶1 Appellant Dennis Stokes (Stokes), personal representative of the estate of Peter Andrew Carter (Carter), appeals the jury verdict and judgment of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court concluding that Ford Motor Company (Ford) and Overland West, Inc. (Overland) were not liable in strict products liability or negligence in Carter’s death. We affirm.

¶2 We consider the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Whether the District Court erred by denying Stokes’ motion for default judgment on liability as a sanction against Ford for withholding evidence of other incidents?

¶4 2. Whether the District…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Sunburst School District No. 2 v. Texaco, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Richardson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Faulconbridge v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Stokes v. Montana Thirteenth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mont. State Univ.-Bozeman v. Mont. First Judicial Dist. CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Mark Spotted Horse v. BNSF RailwayMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  3. S & P Brake Supply, Inc. v. STEMCO LPMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Litwin v. O.T. MiningMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. Mark Spotted Horse v. BNSF RailwayMontana Supreme Court · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API