Legal Opinion

Mark Spotted Horse v. BNSF Railway

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 2015No. DA 14-0257PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cotter

¶1 Mark Spotted Horse appeals from a jury verdict and judgment rendered in favor of BNSF Railway Company in the Eighth Judicial District Court, Cascade County.

¶2 Spotted Horse presents four issues on appeal. Because we reverse and remand, we need address only two issues, which we restate as follows:

1. Whether the District Court abused its discretion in declining to grant Spotted Horse’s request for a default judgment based on the spoliation of video footage taken at BNSF’s Diesel Shop on the day Spotted Horse was injured.

2. Whether the District Court abused its discretion when it instructed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Stimson Lumber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Schuff v. A.T. Klemens & SonMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Richardson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. McKenzie v. ScheelerMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Peterson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mont. State Univ.-Bozeman v. Mont. First Judicial Dist. CourtMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Walden v. Yellowstone ElectricMontana Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Daley v. Burlington N. Santa Fe Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Est. of Mabee v. Wheatland CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Fahrnow v. E-5 Oil ServicesMontana Supreme Court · 2025

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API