Legal Opinion

S & P Brake Supply, Inc. v. STEMCO LP

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2016No. DA 16-0014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 S&P Brake Supply, Inc. (S&P) sued STEMCO LP (STEMCO) for breach of an alleged oral contract for a five-year arrangement to produce and sell remanufactured brakes. STEMCO claimed that the statute of frauds barred the oral contract and that the parol evidence rule precluded evidence of its formation. The District Court denied STEMCO’s motions for summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law. A Yellowstone County jury found in favor of S&P and awarded damages on the oral agreement. STEMCO appeals. We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

1. Whether the District Court erred in denying…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Mary J. Baker Revocable Trust v. Cenex Harvest States, Cooperatives, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Johnson v. Costco WholesaleMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re A.N.Montana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. B & W Glass, Inc. v. Weather Shield Mfg., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Brimstone Mining, Inc. v. GlausMontana Supreme Court · 2003

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of EdwardsMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Kapor v. RJC Inv., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Merila v. BurkeMontana Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Steffensmier v. HuebnerMontana Supreme Court · 2018
  5. BiotronX, LLC v. Tech One Biomedical, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API