Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Donahue

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 3, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 95-0460PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

On this appeal from the dismissal of a complaint, we consider whether the statute of limitations bars a plaintiffs claims that her father sexually molested her from the time she was twelve years old. We hold that her claims of childhood abuse are barred, but that she may sue for acts occurring less than two years before she filed this action.

Although the trial court dismissed the complaint, it considered evidentiary matters in ruling on the motion to dismiss. The court thereby treated the motion as one for summary judgment. See Ariz. R. Civ. P. 12(b). Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Rigazio v. Archdiocese of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993
  3. Hill-Shafer Partnership v. Chilson Family TrustArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Florez v. SargeantArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Gonzalez v. SatrusteguiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cecala v. NewmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
  2. Watkins v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Nolde v. FrankieArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Little v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Thompson v. PaulDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API