Legal Opinion

Meeting House Lane, Ltd. v. Melso

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1993No. 3898PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge:

This is a mortgage foreclosure action based on a Guaranty and Suretyship Agreement, and the appeal arises out of a judgment in a bench trial in favor of appellees-guarantors. Appellant argues presently that the trial court erred in determining that the Agreement was conditional, such that it required the appellant to receive appellees-guarantors’ permission for it to release security other than real estate. Our review of the Agreement indicates that it is unambiguously absolute and unconditional. We, accordingly, find appellant’s argument persuasive and reverse.

The appellees,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Frank v. PeckichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Amoco Oil Co. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Taylor v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. American Ass'n of Meat Processors v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Hagarty v. Wm. Akers, Jr., Co., Inc.Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. American Eagle Outfitters v. Lyle & Scott Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
  2. Pacific Employers Ins Co v. Global Reinsurance Corp of AmeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Profit Wize Marketing v. WiestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Soderberg v. WeiselSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Steinke v. Sungard Financial Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API