Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hancock, Jr., J.
This appeal presents a question of statutory construction which we have not addressed: whether a person aggrieved by a discriminatory practice in violation of the Human Rights Law may recover punitive damages in a court action brought pursuant to Executive Law § 297 (9). Based on our analysis of the statutory language and the relevant legislative history, we conclude that such damages are not recoverable.
I
Plaintiff — alleging sexual harassment in violation of the Human Rights Law — brought an action in Supreme Court pursuant to Executive Law § 297 (9)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Claridge Gardens, Inc. v. MenottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Home Insurance v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by378 opinions
- Danny T. Greenway v. The Buffalo Hilton Hotel, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Steven Weissman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dawn Joy Fashions,inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Father Belle Community Center v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Ponticelli v. Zurich American Insurance GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
373 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.