Legal Opinion

Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1992PublishedCited by 378 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Hancock, Jr., J.

This appeal presents a question of statutory construction which we have not addressed: whether a person aggrieved by a discriminatory practice in violation of the Human Rights Law may recover punitive damages in a court action brought pursuant to Executive Law § 297 (9). Based on our analysis of the statutory language and the relevant legislative history, we conclude that such damages are not recoverable.

I

Plaintiff — alleging sexual harassment in violation of the Human Rights Law — brought an action in Supreme Court pursuant to Executive Law § 297 (9)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Claridge Gardens, Inc. v. MenottiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  4. Home Insurance v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. New York City Transit Authority v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by378 opinions

  1. Danny T. Greenway v. The Buffalo Hilton Hotel, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. Steven Weissman, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Dawn Joy Fashions,inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  3. Copantitla v. Fiskardo Estiatorio, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  4. Father Belle Community Center v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Ponticelli v. Zurich American Insurance GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998

373 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API