Legal Opinion

Succession of Derigny

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 30, 1913No. 19,483PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Palish of Orleans; E. K. Skinner, Judge. Action by the legal heirs of Albert Derigny to recover real estate held by defendant through and from the. universal legatee. From a judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ suit, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtProvosty, J.

This suit is brought by the legal heirs of the de cujus, Albert Derigny, to annul his will, as well as the judgment probating it, and sending the universal legatee into possession, and to recover of the defendant certain real estate which is alleged to have belonged to the succession, and which defendant is alleged to be holding “through and from” the said universal legatee. His title is alleged to be null, and he is alleged to be—

“a possessor in bad faith, having acquired the said properties with full knowledge of the vices and defects with which the said title is and was tainted.”

There is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Martinez v. WallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pfister v. CassoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  2. Succession of RosinskiLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Succession of DerignySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  4. Brown v. FurlongSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  5. Hammon v. SentellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API