Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Succession of Rosinski

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 3, 1963No. 976PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

158 So.2d 467 (1963)

Succession of August B. ROSINSKI.

No. 976.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

December 3, 1963.

Simon & Trice, by Phil Trice, Lafayette, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Arceneaux & Beslin, by Denald A. Beslin, Rayne, Pugh, Buatt & Pugh, by Lawrence G. Pugh, Jr., Crowley, for defendants-appellees.

Before TATE, FRUGE and CULPEPPER, JJ.

CULPEPPER, Judge.

The petitioners, Charles Rosinski and Bertha Rosinski Stewart, alleging themselves to be heirs of August B. Rosinski, deceased, filed this suit attacking the will of the said decedent on the grounds that it is a forgery. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDuffie v. WalkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  2. Long v. ChailanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  3. Dugas v. PowellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  4. McGregor v. McGregorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
  5. Cox v. Lea's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cimarex Energy Co. v. MauboulesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  2. Howard L. Makofsky, Jr. v. Raymond C. Cunningham, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  3. Jackson v. D'AUBINSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1976
  4. Succession of VillarrubiaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  5. Gulf South Bank & Trust Co. v. DemarestLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API