Legal Opinion
McMahon v. City of Newark
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided July 17, 2008PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
The primary question in this appeal requires that we harmonize disparate provisions of the now-repealed Urban Renewal Corporation and Association Law of 1961 (Fox-Lance Law), 1 formerly N.J.S.A. 40:55C-40 to -76, with the comprehensive statutory appeal and review procedures for real estate tax appeals.
Specifically, in this appeal the taxpayer and the municipality had agreed that, in order to encourage a significant urban renewal project, the taxpayer would be exempt from real estate taxes and would pay a defined annual service charge in lieu thereof. More to the point, the taxpayer and the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- F.M.C. Stores Co. v. Borough of Morris PlainsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Kampf v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Pacifico v. PacificoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- State v. Signo Trading International, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Nagy v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re Howmedica Osteonics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Nini v. Mercer County Community CollegeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Prime Accounting Department v. Township of Carney's PointSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Aperion Enterprises Inc. v. Borough of Fair LawnNew Jersey Tax Court · 2009
- Westmont Development Group, LLC v. Township of HaddonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.