Legal Opinion

Magazine Repeating Razor Co. v. Weissbard

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 7, 1939PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a motion to strike the answer and separate defenses filed by the defendants on the ground that the same are sham. It is the third motion made in the cause, a preliminary injunction previously having been denied. An examination of the affidavits now submitted indicates that they are substantially similar to the affidavits before the court in connection with the preliminary injunction. More detail is attempted; basically, however, no new material is presented.

Complainant charges that it gave notice to the defendants on July 1st, 1938, that it had adopted a fair trade contract pursuant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lentheric, Inc. v. WeissbardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
  2. Schaffer v. HurdNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  3. Kruger v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Szczesny v. VasquezNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
  2. Frank Fischer, C., Corp. v. Ritz Drug Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1941
  3. Menley & James Laboratories v. Vornado, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Montclair Distributing Co. v. Arnold Bakers, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948
  5. Eastman Kodak Company v. Home Utilities CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API