Legal Opinion
Amerisure Insurance v. Laserage Technology Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 10, 1998No. 6:96-cv-06313PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SIRAGUSA, District Judge.
This is an action involving the interpretation of two commercial general liability insurance policies. The plaintiffs seek a declaration that they are not obligated to provide a defense to the defendants, who were sued in an underlying ease previously filed in this Court entitled Kalman Zsamboky and Zecal, Inc. v. Laserage Technology, Corp., Cirqon Technologies Corp., Arthur O. Capp, Jr. and Stephen L. Capp (95-CV-6332). The following motions are before the Court:
1. Motion [72-1] by the plaintiff Ameri-sure for summary judgment against Laser-age and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Crum & Forster Managers Corp. v. Resolution Trust Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Anthony J. Chipollini v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of Anthony J. ChipolliniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Atlantic Mutual Insurance v. J. Lamb, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance v. Applied Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- MHM Services v. Assurance Company of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Winklevoss Consultants, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Sentinel Insurance Co. v. CoganDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.