Legal Opinion

Mayor of Baltimore v. Bio Gro Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 12, 1984No. 26PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, it is this 7th day of June, 1984

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City be, and it is hereby, affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that the mandate shall issue forthwith, costs to be paid by the appellants.

OPINION

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

The issue in this case is whether the extension by mutual consent of a competitively bid municipal contract beyond its *250original term violates the competitive bidding requirements of the Baltimore City Charter.

Appellant Enviro-Gro, a joint…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Packard v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  2. Post v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  3. Browning-Ferris Industries of Tennessee, Inc. v. City of Oak RidgeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  4. Hanna v. Bd. of Ed. of Wicomico Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
  5. Board of Education v. AllenderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. McBirney & Associates v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Penpac, Inc. v. Morris County Municipal Utilities AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  3. Alleco, Inc. v. IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1989
  4. Social Bicycles LLC v. City of Chicago Department of TransportationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API