Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBS, Justice:
Todd Miller (“Miller”) and his wife— Victoria Miller, the plaintiffs, appeal from two Superior Court orders denying their motions to exclude evidence in a personal injury action in which State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), Millers’ underinsured motorist carrier, was a codefendant. On appeal, the Millers claim that the Superior Court erred by admitting evidence, in violation of the collateral source rule, that Miller had received workers’ compensation benefits and had entered into a settlement with his employer’s workers’ compensation carrier (the “WC…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Yarrington v. ThornburgSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
- Mitchell v. HaldarSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. MidcapSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. NalboneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Adams v. Delmarva Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Stoms v. Federated Service InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Abdullah v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
- Active Day OH, Inc. v. WehrSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
- Carletta E. Simpson v. State of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.