Legal Opinion

Miller v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 21, 2010No. 570, 2009PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Justice:

Todd Miller (“Miller”) and his wife— Victoria Miller, the plaintiffs, appeal from two Superior Court orders denying their motions to exclude evidence in a personal injury action in which State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”), Millers’ underinsured motorist carrier, was a codefendant. On appeal, the Millers claim that the Superior Court erred by admitting evidence, in violation of the collateral source rule, that Miller had received workers’ compensation benefits and had entered into a settlement with his employer’s workers’ compensation carrier (the “WC…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Yarrington v. ThornburgSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  2. Mitchell v. HaldarSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
  3. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. MidcapSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. NalboneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
  5. Adams v. Delmarva Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Estrada v. PORT CITY PROPERTIES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  2. Stoms v. Federated Service InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Abdullah v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 2022
  4. Active Day OH, Inc. v. WehrSuperior Court of Delaware · 2024
  5. Carletta E. Simpson v. State of DelawareSuperior Court of Delaware · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API