Legal Opinion

People v. Higgins

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 5, 1917No. 9183PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Original Proceeding in Mandamus. Alternative writ made absolute.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

The relators, in attempting to carry out the provisions of the legislative act, adopted at the general election in 1916, entitled: “An Act in relation to the investment of the Public School Fund,” Chapter 122, Session Laws 1917, page 446, were unable to do so because of the refusal of respondent to pay the amount of a loan ordered and approved by relators under the provisions of the statute. It is conceded that relators and the applicant for the loan have performed the duties imposed upon them by the terms of the act; and that, unless the statute is unconstitutional, the alternative writ…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Loan of School FundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  2. In re House Resolution Relating to House Bill No. 349Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  3. Leddy v. People ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Colorado · 1915

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stong v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  2. Groditsky v. PinckneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  3. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1999
  4. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1986
  5. No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API