Legal Opinion
Stong v. Industrial Commission
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided February 20, 1922No. 10,236PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Action in mandamus to compel the state treasurer to invest money belonging to the state compensation insurance fund in United States bonds. Writ granted. Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Charles C. Butler, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
The district court upon the relation of the Industrial Commission, granted a peremptory mandamus, requiring Stong, state treasurer, to invest $200,000 of the state compensation insurance fund in United States bonds. He brings error.
The statute, S. L. 1919, chapter 210, contains the following :
“Section 123. The Commission is hereby vested with full power, authority and jurisdiction over the State Compensation Insurance Fund and may do and perform any and all things, whether herein specifically designated or in addition thereto, which are necessary or convenient in the exercise of any power,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kendall v. United States Ex Rel. StokesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Bell v. ThomasSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- People v. HigginsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
3Cited by21 opinions
- Mac Manus v. LoveSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- City of Colorado Springs v. StreetSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
- Colorado General Assembly v. LammSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Denver Area Labor Federation, AFL-CIO v. BuckleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Denver Area Labor Federation, AFL-CIO v. MeyerColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.