Motor Finance Co. v. Noyes
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtManser, J.
This case was heard by a Referee with right of exceptions reserved. To his report, filed in Superior Court, in favor of the plaintiff, objection was made by defendant that the correct legal principles governing the factual situation were not applied. The presiding Justice upheld the objection, and the report was not accepted. The case then came forward upon exceptions by the plaintiff to the ruling of the presiding Justice. Neither side disagrees with the Referee’s findings as to facts.
The case arose out of an automobile accident involving a truck operated by the defendant, Noyes, and an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harris v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Downey v. Bay State Street RailwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Harris v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Belli v. ForsythMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Stotts v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Harvester Credit Corp. v. ValdezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- GLOBE SLICING MACHINE CO., INC. v. Casco Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- In re Merrymeeting Products Corp.District Court, D. Maine · 1956
- Farmers & Merchants Bank & Trust Co. v. JenningsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- GLOBE SLICING MACHINE CO., INC. v. Casco Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958