Legal Opinion

P.H. Investment v. Oliver

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1991No. 890357PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

This is an unlawful detainer action by P.H. Investment (the landlord) against Cathy Oliver (the tenant) based upon nonpayment of rent. Because of the deteriorated condition of the premises, the tenant argued that she owed no rent and counterclaimed for a rebate of rent paid. At trial, an officer with the Salt Lake City Building and Housing Services testified that there were forty-two housing code violations on the rental premises. The violations included numerous electrical violations, a hazardous stairway without handrails, holes in the walls in every room, dilapidated and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Boston Housing Authority v. HemingwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Mease Ex Rel. Oliver v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  4. Kline v. BurnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  5. Berzito v. GambinoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bichler v. DEI Systems, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Chase v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2001
  3. Building Monitoring Systems, Inc. v. PaxtonUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Kenyon v. ReganCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  5. Aris Vision Institute, Inc. v. Wasatch Property Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API