Legal Opinion
In Re Connecticut Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 7, 1938No. 180Published
1Opinion of the Court
95 F.2d 311 (1938)
In re CONNECTICUT CO.[*]
Claim of CONNECTICUT RY. & LIGHTING CO.
No. 180.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 7, 1938.
Emmet, Marvin & Martin, of New York City (George W. Martin, of New York City, of counsel), for Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.
James Garfield, of Boston, Mass. (Hermon J. Wells, of New Haven, Conn., and Laurens H. Rhinelander, of Boston, Mass., of counsel), for Connecticut Co.
Mendel Lurie, of New York City, for group of stockholders of Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.
Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
D…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1912
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Silver King Coalition Mines Co. of Nevada v. Silver King Consol. Mining Co. of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. New York City Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. New York Rys. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.