Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1903No. 4623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Campbell

This appeal is from an order awarding temporary alimony in an action by the wife against the husband for separate maintenance. No divorce was sought. The intérlocutory order awarded attorney’s fees, court costs and continuing temporary alimony for the wife at the rate of $60 per month, all aggregating, at the time the appeal was perfected, a sum much less than $2,500. There is no claim that any of the elements, made essential by the court of appeals act, to our Jurisdiction now exists, but it is claimed, as we understand the argument, that from its analogy to a proceeding in divorce, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daniels v. DanielsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  2. Mercer v. MercerColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Eickhoff v. EickhoffColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Eickhoff v. EickhoffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900
  5. Park v. ParkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rosenthal v. RosenthalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Tinglof v. AskerlundSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  3. Fyke v. FykeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Weston v. WestonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  5. Fahey v. FaheySupreme Court of Colorado · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API