Legal Opinion

Fahey v. Fahey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1903No. 4614Published

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver. Motion to Dismiss Writ of Error:

1Per curiam

Motion of plaintiffs in error to dismiss the writ of error. Defendant in error resists. The general rule is that a plaintiff in error, or appellant, is entitled, as a matter of right, to dismiss his writ or appeal. And in the absence of some showing that the defendant in error, or appellee, wonld be prejudiced thereby, it would seem that this right should be fully protected. — Becker v. Henderson, 5 Colo. 346; 7 Enc. Pl. & Pr. 906.

The defendant in error here has no right that would be prejudiced by granting this motion. And in this case, even if she .had assigned cross-errors, that would not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  2. Park v. ParkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901
  3. Lochbrunner v. ShermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  4. Becker v. HendersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880
  5. First National Bank v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API