Legal Opinion
Oertel Co. v. Gregory
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided February 10, 1921No. 89PublishedCited by 7 opinions
In Equity. Suit by the Oertel Company against W. V. Gregory, District Attorney, and Paul M. Williams, Prohibition Agent. Our motion for injunction and motion to dismiss bill.
1Opinion of the Court
WARTER EVANS, District Judge.
[1,2] The Eighteenth Amend- ■ . ment to the Constitution of the United States is as follows:
“Section 1. After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited.
“Sec. 2. The Congress and the several states shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.”
It was ratified by the requisite…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- The Fair v. Kohler Die & Specialty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lake County v. RollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Bate Refrigerating Co. v. SulzbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Standard Brewery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re Phoenix Cereal Beverage Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Stroh Products Co. v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1925
- California Wine Ass'n v. DoranDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1928
- Doran v. Colonial Drug & Sales Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.