Legal Opinion

Raymond Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 20, 1978No. 74-3177PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio, 5 Cir., 1975, 520 F.2d 993, a panel of this Court held that the Board of Trustees of the policemen’s and firemen’s pension fund was a “person” within the meaning of 42 U.S. C.A. § 1983. Having made this determination, the Court further found that plaintiff’s claims of constitutional violations held no merit. 1

On rehearing en banc, 528 F.2d 499, this Court upheld the panel’s result, but found (1) that neither the City nor the Board was a § 1983 “person,” and (2) that we did not have jurisdiction over the individual members of the Board to require them to make…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Raymond Muzquiz v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  3. Raymond Muzquiz v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gay Student Services v. Texas a & M UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Hess v. St. Joseph Police Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  3. Hess v. St. Joseph Police Pension FundDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1985
  4. Grandia v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. Hess v. The St. Joseph Police Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API