Legal Opinion

Raymond Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1976No. 74--3177PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DYER, Circuit Judge:

Former San Antonio policemen and firemen filed this class action against the *500Pension Fund Board of Trustees and its individual members seeking damages and refunds of the amounts they obligatorily contributed to a pension fund during their employment but which they were barred from receiving after their separation under Article 6243f, § 19, Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes.1 They raised a myriad of constitutional challenges to the no-refund provisions of the statute. The district court granted summary judgment for the defendants. A panel of this Court, finding that the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Raymond Muzquiz v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Edward Nekolny, Patrick Dumas, and Maria L. Dahms v. Ann B. Painter, Individually and as Supervisor of Lyons Township, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Richard Franklin Miller v. Dale Carson, Individually and in His Capacity as Sheriff of Duval County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Thurston v. DekleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. Curran v. Portland Superintending School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1977
  5. Burt v. AbelCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API