Legal Opinion
Raymond Muzquiz v. City of San Antonio
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 8, 1975No. 74-3177PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiffs are former San Antonio policemen and firemen who challenge the operation of the city’s Firemen’s and Policemen’s Pension Fund. The remaining defendants are the Pension Fund Board of Trustees and its members as individual party defendants. Pursuant to Article 6243f of Vernon’s Texas Civil Statutes the city of San Antonio maintains a pension fund to which all policemen and firemen are obliged to contribute a portion of their salaries. The pension fund provides death and disability benefits for officers injured in the line of duty, and provides retirement…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Edward Nekolny, Patrick Dumas, and Maria L. Dahms v. Ann B. Painter, Individually and as Supervisor of Lyons Township, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- 12 Fair empl.prac.cas. 836, 11 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,755 Jane Monell v. Department of Social Services of the City of New York, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Raymond Muzquiz v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- First Ala. Bank of Montgomery, NA v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- John C. Reeves v. City of Jackson, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.