Legal Opinion
In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against Vanderveen
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 2009No. 200,569-1PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
211 P.3d 1008 (2009)
In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST A. Mark VANDERVEEN, an attorney at law.
No. 200,569-1.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
Argued January 13, 2009.
Decided July 16, 2009.
Kurt M. Bulmer, Attorney at Law, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.
Christine Gray, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
C. JOHNSON, J.
¶ 1 A. Mark Vanderveen appeals the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) Disciplinary Board's (Board) recommendation of disbarment arising from his guilty plea for willful failure to file a currency report, a felony, in violation of 31…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Fred S. PangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee v. Thomas Ewing CowanTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Grocery Mfrs. Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against ScannellWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.