Legal Opinion
McNeely v. Metro. Life Ins. Co.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided March 26, 2019No. 18 Civ. 885 (PAC)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HONORABLE PAUL A. CROTTY, United States District Judge:
Plaintiffs, dentists and dental hygienists who evaluated claims submitted by treating dentists for Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MetLife"), bring this proposed class and collective action against *228MetLife and employee benefit plans1 under the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), and the statutes and common law of Illinois, New York, New Jersey, and Rhode Island, Plaintiffs allege that MetLife unlawfully classified them and others similarly situated as independent contractors,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Umland v. PLANCO Financial Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Katz v. Cellco PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Mikulski v. Centerior Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aronow, M.D. v. Retina First LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Hernandez v. Prime Structure, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Leznik v. Lincoln Financial Advisors CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2020
- Rathod v. Wellington Physical Therapy and Acupuncture PLLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024