Legal Opinion
Katz v. Cellco Partnership
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 28, 2015No. Docket Nos. 14-138 (Lead), 14-291(XAP)PublishedCited by 389 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY, Circuit Judge:
In an effort to more efficiently manage their dockets, some district courts in this Circuit will dismiss an action after having compelled arbitration pursuant to a binding arbitration agreement between the parties. That is what happened here. After the District Court (Briccetti, J.) found Michael A. Katz’s state law claims against Célico Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless (“Verizon”) to be arbitrable, the court compelled arbitration but denied Verizon’s request to stay proceedings.1 By dismissing the case, however, the District Court made the matter immediately…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Eduardo M. Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections and Michael J. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Lexecon Inc. v. Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & LerachSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by389 opinions
- Smith v. SpizzirriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Samake v. Thunder Lube, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Jernard Griggs v. S.G.E. Management, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Timothy Boykin v. Family Dollar Stores of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Daly v. Citigroup Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
384 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.