Legal Opinion

United States v. Ralph Leo Fairchild

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided November 10, 1986No. 84-7624PublishedCited by 40 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Ralph Leo Fairchild, proceeding pro se on appeal, seeks to withdraw his guilty plea, have his conviction for engaging in a continuing criminal enterprise in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 848 reversed, and a trial. We find that Fairchild made a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea of guilty, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Fairchild’s motion to withdraw the plea. We further find that Fairchild has failed to show ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

Fairchild was indicted on November 22, 1982, on two counts of conspiracy to distribute and possession with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. Winston Eugene DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Rodney E. Wofford v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. United States v. TomeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. PattiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Danielle Lenise BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. Lauro Puentes-HurtadoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API