Legal Opinion

United States v. Danielle Lenise Brown

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 28, 2014No. 13-10023PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULL, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Danielle Brown pled guilty to knowingly receiving 481 counterfeit United States Postal Money Orders from a foreign country with the intent to pass and publish these same counterfeit money orders as true, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 473. As part of her plea deal, Brown expressly agreed to waive any appeal to her conviction or sentence. Nonetheless, Brown now appeals her conviction and sentence, contending— for the first time — that her indictment was defective because it did not expressly allege the mens rea element of the § 473 offense. Brown argues…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Ex Parte BainSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. United States v. CarllSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Cleveland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. United States v. BaldeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Bernard MooreCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Isaac HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Gregory BaneCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API