Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Board of Police Pension Fund Commissioners

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 23, 1941No. Civ. No. 11749PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The two petitioners sought a writ of mandate to effect their retirement under the Police Pension Act. The demurrer was sustained without leave to amend.

The petitioners are both constables who have served as such in separate townships of San Mateo County for more than thirty years. The respondents are the three public officials of the county designated by the act of March 4, 1889 *683(DBering’s Gen. Laws, Act 6012) to serve as the board of police pension fund commissioners of the county, except that the sheriff is sued as one of said commissioners instead of the “chief of police” who is named as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennie v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Kenyon v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bila v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Shealor v. City of LodiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Shealor v. City of LodiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Shealor v. City of LodiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API