Legal Opinion

Hartford Fire Insurance v. Tempur-Sealy International, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 20, 2016No. Case No. 14-cv-01661-HSGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Re: Dkt. Nos. 53, 64

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge

Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED and Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.

*880I. BACKGROUND

The following material facts are not in dispute.

A. Insurance Policies

Plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Co. issued nine comprehensive general liability insurance policies to Defendants Tempur-Sealy International, Inc. and Tempur-Pedic…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Henstooth Ranch LLC v. Burlington Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API