Hartford Fire Insurance v. Tempur-Sealy International, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 53, 64
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., United States District Judge
Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED and Defendants’ motion is GRANTED.
*880I. BACKGROUND
The following material facts are not in dispute.
A. Insurance Policies
Plaintiff Hartford Fire Insurance Co. issued nine comprehensive general liability insurance policies to Defendants Tempur-Sealy International, Inc. and Tempur-Pedic…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Keenan v. AllanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Henstooth Ranch LLC v. Burlington Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018