Legal Opinion

Tomaiolo v. Mallinoff

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 19, 2002No. 01-1456PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

Twenty-three owners of real property in Rhode Island were disadvantaged by being part of a group required to pay their real estate taxes annually rather than quarterly. These property owners, whose mortgage companies held their tax payments in escrow, were required to pay taxes in one lump sum; other property owners, who paid their taxes directly to the municipalities, could choose to pay quarterly. The quarterly payment method is more favorable to the taxpayer because it permits the taxpayer to receive the interest on the escrowed funds until the quarter in which payment…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Redondo Construction Corp. v. IzquierdoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  2. Sexual Minorities Uganda v. LivelyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
  3. Real Estate Bar Association for Massachusetts, Inc. v. National Real Estate Information ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  4. Patel v. City of San BernardinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Shapiro v. HaennDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2002

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API