Legal Opinion
Shapiro v. Haenn
District Court, D. Maine
Decided August 26, 2002No. 1:01-cv-00101PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SINGAL, District Judge.
Plaintiff claims that a bank and its attorney improperly filed a foreclosure action against him and pursued it after he had satisfied the underlying debt fully, in violation of state and federal consumer protection laws and state tort law. Four motions are presently before the Court: (1) Defendants Camden National Bank and Camden National Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 33); (2) Defendant Haenn’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 25); (3) Plaintiffs Motion to Strike (Docket # 31); and (4) Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Heintz v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Rodriguez-Bruno v. Doral MortgageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Douglas T. Wightman v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company and United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Johnson v. RiddleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Harrington v. CACV OF COLORADO, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007
- Wittenberg v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2012
- Zebrowski v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
- Caputo v. Professional Recovery Services, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.