Legal Opinion

Patel v. City of San Bernardino

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 13, 2002No. 01-55280PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES R. BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

Pravin D. Patel and twenty other named plaintiffs sued the city of San Bernardino, California for damages stemming from the city’s enforcement of an unlawful tax. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

I

The plaintiffs are owners and operators of hotels in the city of San Bernardino. The city imposed a “transient occupancy tax” on certain hotel guests, and the plaintiffs were required to collect this tax from their customers and remit it to the city. In 1991, the plaintiffs filed a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kowenhoven v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. May Trucking Company v. Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Lowe v. Washoe CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Pontes v. CunhaDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2004
  5. James T. (Tom) Higdon v. State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API