Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Danaher Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1909No. 8000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered October 14, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee in a sawmill.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Plaintiff was employed as a dogger in a sawmill operated by defendant at Tacoma, Washington. One *597McBane, under whose immediate direction he worked, was head sawyer, and one Marble was filer. It was a part of the plaintiff’s duty to assist the head sawyer in changing the band saw at the log carriage in the mill. This work was generally done at noon after the mill had been shut down for the lunch hour. The physical situation of the machinery in the mill was about as it is in all sawmills; a log carriage upon which the logs were placed for cutting carried the Jogs to the main saw; the cants fell…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mast v. KernOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McDonough v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Shannon v. Consolidated Tiger & Poorman Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Hammarberg v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Nelson v. S. Willey Steamship & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colonna Shipyard, Inc. v. BlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  2. Martin v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Jacobsen v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Smith v. Hewitt-Lea Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API