Legal Opinion

Martin v. Hill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1912No. 9674PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Main, J,, entered March 4, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, for the sum of $4,495.95, in an action for personal injuries sustained by a carpenter engaged in the construction of defendant’s house.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Plaintiff, who is a carpenter, was engaged in talcing down forms on a house built of concrete. The house was owned by the defendant. A gin pole had been set up on the roof of the building; and having performed its office, the carpenter’s foreman, one Thompson, said in the presence and hearing of several workmen engaged on or about the roof, “Come, boys, and give us a hand to take down that gin pole.” Plaintiff left his task and with others prepared to assist in lowering the pole, which was some thirty-five feet high and made up of sections of rolled iron pipe, six inches in diameter at the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cogswell v. West Street & North End Electric Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Engelking v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Olson v. EricksonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Hall v. Northwest Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Mueller v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hicks v. JenkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Koloff v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Tweeten v. Tacoma Ry. & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
  4. Peterson v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Melius v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Pugget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API