Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 1, 2000No. 1981560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Application for Rehearing.

The opinion of April 28, 2000, is withdrawn, and the following is substituted therefor.

In this condemnation action, the circuit court awarded the landowners their litigation expenses, including an attorney fee. The State appeals, arguing that the award was not authorized. We agree. Therefore, we reverse the judgment to the extent it awarded those expenses. The State has not challenged any other portions of the condemnation judgment. We remand the case for the circuit court to amend its judgment to make it consistent with this opinion.

I

Virgil Armstrong and Ann…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Ex Parte CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. Citizens of StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Asphalt Contractors Inc. v. Alabama Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  2. Chavers v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Neely v. Elmore CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2022
  4. Neely v. Elmore CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2024
  5. State v. HowingtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API