Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Howington

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 2002No. 1000610 to 1000612Published

1DissentHouston, Justice

Our review of the trial court’s summary judgment is de novo.

I doubt if any Alabama judge or Justice has had his or her property acquired by eminent domain as often as I have. The federal government acquired property in which I owned an interest for the im-poundment of Lake Eufaula (Lake Walter F. George) and later to establish a Canadian Goose Fly Way (the Eufaula Wildlife Refuge). The State of Alabama acquired property in which I owned an interest to create the Barbour County Wildlife Refuge and to extend and widen two roads (U.S. Highway 431 and Alabama Highway 165). Because of this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Adirondack Railway Co. v. New York StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Jones v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API