Legal Opinion

Carothers v. Pittsburg Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1911No. Appeal, No. 64PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal, No. 64, Oct. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., May T., 1909, No. 98, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Robert Carothers v. Pittsburg Railways Co. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Taylor, J. The injuries complained of were alleged to have been caused by the negligent starting of defendant’s car while the plaintiff was attempting to board it.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 64, Oct. T., 1910, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., May T., 1909, No. 98, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Robert Carothers v. Pittsburg Railways Co. Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Taylor, J. The injuries complained of were alleged to have been caused by the negligent starting of defendant’s car while the plaintiff was attempting to board it. At the close of his argument, Mr. Levengood, of counsel for plaintiff, stated to the jury that suit had been brought in this case for $25,000 damages. Mr. Irwin: We object to the statement of…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Fell,

The plaintiff obtained a verdict for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the starting of the defendant’s car, while he was in the act of getting on it. Counsel for the plaintiff at the close of his argument stated to the jury that the action had been brought to recover $25,000 damages. At the request of the defendant’s counsel the statement was noted on the record and the court was asked to withdraw a juror and to continue the case. The refusal of this request is the subject of the first assignment of error.

The statement by the court or by counsel in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Holden v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Hollis v. United States Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Hollinger v. York Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Saxton v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  5. Wagner v. Hazle TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Celia Gumbs and James Gumbs v. Pueblo International, Inc. D/B/A Pueblo Supermarkets. Appeal of Pueblo International, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Narciso v. Mauch Chunk TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Clark v. Essex Wire Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Vaughan v. MageeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API