Vaughan v. Magee
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; J. Whitaker Thompson, Judge. Action at law by Mary Magee against Ira Vaughan. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
In the court below Miss Mary Magee, the plaintiff, a citizen of New York, brought suit against Ira Vaughan, a citizen of Pennsylvania, to recover damages for injuries sustained by her through his alleged negligence. Such alleged-negligence consisted in an automobile, for which it was contended Vaughan was responsible, striking a carriage in which Miss Magee was riding. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, and, judgment having been entered for the damages found, defendant sued out this writ.
*631After careful consideration of the case, we are of opinion there was a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hollinger v. York Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Reese v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Carothers v. Pittsburg Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Quinn v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Dougherty v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
3Cited by27 opinions
- Botta v. BrunnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Henne v. BalickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1958
- Crum v. WardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
- Certified TV and Appliance Company v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1959
- Smith v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.