Legal Opinion
Honolulu Oil Corp. v. Shelby Poultry Co.
District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Decided July 8, 1960No. Civ. No. 1182PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WARLICK, District Judge.
This is a patent suit in which the plaintiffs charge infringement. The defendants set up the defenses of invalidity, non-infringement, unfair competition, and alteration of original application specifications.
The plaintiff, Honolulu Oil Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in San Francisco, California. The plaintiff, Barker Poultry Equipment Company is an Iowa corporation with its main office in Ottumwa, in that State. Barker manufactures poultry processing equipment.
The defendant, Pickwick Company is an Iowa corporation with its…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Hunt v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
- Interstate Rubber Products Corp. v. Radiator Specialty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1954
- The American Monorail Company v. Parks-Cramer CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Honolulu Oil Corp. v. Shelby Poultry Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
- Sanders v. TirelloDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020