Legal Opinion
Van Dorsten v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 21, 2008No. 3:08 CV 210 (MRK)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING AND ORDER
MARK R. KRAVITZ, District Judge.
This case arises from Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company’s (“Provident Life”) decision to deny Plaintiff Ellen Van Dorsten benefits under her disability income insurance policy for the period from April 1, 2003 through July 2004. Ms. Van Dorsten’s Complaint alleges claims for breach of contract (First Count), breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Second Count) and violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), Conn. Gen.Stat. § 42-110b, arising from an alleged violation of the Connecticut Unfair…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Iqbal v. HastyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Benzman v. WhitmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hospital for Special Care v. Mallory Industries, IncorporatedDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- New England Systems, Inc. v. Citizens Insurance Company of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022