Legal Opinion

Tower & Sons v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 7, 1923No. 2199PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSjiith, Judge

An importation consisting of a mixture of wheat, oats, barley, weed seed, chaff, and dust or dirt was classified by the collector *490of customs at the port of Buffalo, N. Y., as screenings and assessed for duty at 10 per cent ad valorem as a nonenumerated unmanu-factured article under that part of paragraph 385 of the tariff act of 1913 which reads as follows: , -

Pak. 385. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of all raw or unmanufactured articles not enumerated or provided for in this section, a duty of 10 per centum ad valorem. * * *

The importers protested that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williamson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Atwood-Stone Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  2. Bush & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. Farnsworth v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  4. Gidden v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Tower v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API