Legal Opinion
Maxwell Technologies, Inc. v. Nesscap, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided August 27, 2007No. Civil 06cv2311 JAH (BLM)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,631,074
JOHN A. HOUSTON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Now pending before this Court is Plaintiff Maxwell Technologies, Inc.’s (“Plaintiff’) motion for preliminary injunction of U.S. Patent No. 6,631,074 (the “'074 Patent”). Doc. No. 13. Defendants Nesscap, Inc. and Nesscap Co., Ltd. (collectively “Defendants”) oppose this motion. This matter came on for hearing on June 21, 2007 and August 9, 2007 with appearances by David Doyle and Eric Acker for Plaintiff, and George Neuner, Brian Gaff, Andrea Kimball and Scott…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União Do VegetalSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Reebok International Ltd. v. J. Baker, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Oakley, Inc. v. Sunglass Hut International, Lenscrafters, Inc., Ray Ban Sun Optics, Luxottica Group S.P.A., and Leonardo Del VecchioCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Caesars Riverboat Casino, LLC v. BeachKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
- World Class Technology Corp. v. Ormco Corp.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Carbon Autonomous Robotic Systems Inc. v. Laudando & Assoc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025