Legal Opinion
World Class Technology Corp. v. Ormco Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 9, 2013No. Civ. No. 3:13-cv-00401-ACPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ACOSTA, United States Magistrate Judge:
Introduction
World Class Technology Corporation (‘WCT”) seeks declaratory judgment of noninfringement of five patents owned by Ormco Corporation (“Ormco”). Ormco asserts a counterclaim of infringement of its U.S. Patent No. 8,393,896 (“the '896 Patent”), a sixth patent now the subject of this litigation. Relevant to the present motion, Ormco accuses WCT of marketing an infringing product, the H4 bracket. Ormco now moves for a preliminary injunction to halt sales of the allegedly infringing H4 bracket. The court concludes that Ormco has…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- World Class Technology Corp v. Ormco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014