Legal Opinion

Griffith v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2003No. 41S00-0109-CR-438PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

While in police custody, appellant Fernando Griffith confessed that he burglarized the residence of Lloyd and Judy Georges, murdered the couple, and set fire to their home. He contends that his confession should have been suppressed because the authorities were tardy in presenting him to a magistrate after his arrest.

We agree that this delay exceeded acceptable limits, but conclude that the trial court correctly declined to suppress the confession, which was given well after Griffith's initial court appearance, during an interview which he requested.

Statement of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. County of Riverside v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Powell v. NevadaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Desmond Turner v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Wilkes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Clark v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. GoodinIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Summer Snow v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API