Defoe v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The defendant-appellant, William L. Defoe, filed this appeal from an order of the Superior Court denying his Motion for Correction of Sentence pursuant to Superi- or Court Criminal Rule 35. We have concluded that Defoe’s motion was properly denied. Therefore, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed. Nevertheless, we hold that Defoe is entitled to periodic review by the Superior Court until its original sentencing plan is either implemented or modified by the Superior Court.
Facts
In 1998, Defoe was charged with Burglary in the Second Degree, Burglary in the Third Degree,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brittingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- United States v. Joseph J. PavlicoCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by22 opinions
- State v. BrueggerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- State of Delaware v. Redden.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015
- Colon v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Nave v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Fatir v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.